
Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.5: Which AI Video Model to Use in 2026
Oct 2026
Wan 3.0 (Alibaba) and Seedance 2.5 (ByteDance) are the two video models on Flick that run to 30 seconds with sound in one generation. We took three shots from one of our own short films, a snowbound cabin thriller made on a Flick canvas, and ran each through both models from the same start frame, with the same prompt, length and resolution, in the image-to-video node.
The short version: both followed simple shots and spoke their lines word for word, but on camera language Seedance 2.5 read the prompt as direction and Wan 3.0 read it literally. Wan costs a quarter as much. Premium video models are available on Standard and above, and both of these are among them.
Quick answer: Wan 3.0 or Seedance 2.5?
Connect a start frame to a video node, then:
- Use Wan 3.0 for cheap takes of simple shots. 60 credits for 5 seconds at 720p, against 240 on Seedance 2.5.
- Use Seedance 2.5 when the prompt carries camera direction. It turned "the handheld camera whips back" into a whip pan; Wan added a cameraman.
- Write camera moves as moves. "Whip pan to the woman" is safer than "the camera whips" on Wan.
| Wan 3.0 | Seedance 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Alibaba | ByteDance |
| Length on Flick | 2 to 30 s | 4 to 30 s |
| Resolution on Flick | 480p, 720p, 1080p | 480p, 720p, 1080p |
| Output we got (720p) | 1280 × 720, 30 fps | 1284 × 716, 24 fps |
| Aspect ratio | Pick one of five | Follows the start frame |
| Audio | Native, on by default | Native, on by default |
| 5 s at 720p | 60 credits | 240 credits |
| 15 s at 720p | 180 credits | 720 credits |
Run one shot on two models
Same frame, same prompt: keep the take that cuts in.
The setup
Three shots from the film, each with an existing Seedance 2.5 take. We used Regenerate on each Seedance clip and switched the model to Wan 3.0, which keeps the start frame, the prompt, the length and the resolution. All runs at 720p.
Test 1: crows scatter at a gunshot, 5 seconds
An overhead night shot of a snowbound cabin with crows on the roof. The prompt, in Chinese, reads: "The crows hear a gunshot and scatter. Fixed camera."

A tie. Both held the camera still and sent the crows off the roof on cue. Wan added a white puff at the roof, a nice touch for a gunshot, and kept more birds in the air for longer.
Test 2: a scream and a push into the mouth, 4 seconds
A close-up of a frightened woman with a bruised eye, a pistol held to her head out of frame. The prompt: "The woman screams hysterically: 'Do it!' When she says 'it!', the camera quickly zoom pans into her mouth until the screen is dark."

Both nailed it. A speech-to-text pass returned "Do it!" from each, and both crashed the camera into her mouth in the last half second. Seedance got to the anger sooner, a bared-teeth grimace in the first second; Wan built the fear more slowly.
Test 3: a line of dialogue and a whip pan, 15 seconds
Two start frames: a man silhouetted in the cabin doorway, and the woman with the pistol at her head. The prompt: "The man says, 'You know I don't want to do this.' Then the handheld camera whips left back to the woman."

Both spoke the line word for word and both ended on the woman. The difference is how they read "the handheld camera whips". Seedance 2.5 treated it as camera direction: it stayed on the man as he spoke, then whip-panned, with motion blur at about 10 seconds, to her. Wan 3.0 treated it as something in the scene: at 4.5 seconds it cut to a new character, a man in a beanie operating a video camera with a light on top, then cut to the window and on to the woman. That character is not in either start frame or in the film.
Sound, time and cost
| Shot | Model | Credits | Loudness | Time to finish |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crows, 5 s | Wan 3.0 | 60 | -15.2 LUFS | 3 min 12 s |
| Crows, 5 s | Seedance 2.5 | 240 | -23.0 LUFS | not recorded |
| Scream, 4 s | Wan 3.0 | 48 | -19.3 LUFS | 2 min 36 s |
| Scream, 4 s | Seedance 2.5 | 192 | -18.3 LUFS | not recorded |
| Line, 15 s | Wan 3.0 | 180 | -22.1 LUFS | 5 min 51 s |
| Line, 15 s | Seedance 2.5 | 720 | -26.9 LUFS | not recorded |
Credits are today's Flick rates at 720p; at 1080p Wan doubles and Seedance multiplies by 2.25. Wan's mixes ran louder on two of the three shots, by up to 8 dB; level them before cutting the models together. Seedance 2.5 also has a cheaper Draft Mode at 480p. Rates for every model are on model credit costs.
Which one to use
| You want | Use | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Cheap takes of a simple, fixed shot | Wan 3.0 | Matched Seedance on the crows at a quarter of the price |
| Dialogue with a camera move written in | Seedance 2.5 | Read "the handheld camera whips" as a whip pan |
| A fast, punchy beat | Either | Both landed the scream and the push into the mouth |
| An aspect ratio different from the frame | Wan 3.0 | Lets you pick; Seedance follows the frame |
| Clips over 15 s with a sequence of beats | Seedance 2.5 | Fewer invented cuts in our tests |
The column "Why" is our assessment from these runs. More: Wan 3.0 guide, plan shots that cut together.
Prompting tips for both
- Write camera moves as moves. "Whip pan left to the woman" leaves less to interpret than "the camera whips".
- Keep "camera" out of the action when you mean the lens. Wan turned a camera in the prompt into a person holding one.
- Put dialogue in quotes. Both models spoke our quoted lines word for word.
- Use two frames for a shot that moves between subjects. Both ended on our second frame.
- If motion goes somewhere you did not ask for, see motion not what I asked.
Sources
- Wan 3.0 video generation guide, Alibaba Cloud Model Studio
- Seedance 2.5, ByteDance Seed, checked October 21, 2026
- ByteDance launches Seedance 2.5, TechNode, July 31, 2026
- Clips, credit rates, timings and measurements from a Flick canvas, October 2026
Related guides
- Generate a video
- Plan shots that cut together
- Motion not what I asked
- Model credit costs
- How to use Wan 3.0
- Seedance 2.5 Draft Mode
- FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.5
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Seedance 2.5 better than Wan 3.0?
Do both models do dialogue? Yes. Both spoke our quoted lines word for word, with sound effects underneath.
Do both models do dialogue?
How long can each video be? Up to 30 seconds on both: 2 to 30 on Wan 3.0, 4 to 30 on Seedance 2.5.
How long can each video be?
Which is cheaper? Wan 3.0: 60 credits for 5 seconds at 720p against 240 on Seedance 2.5.
Which is cheaper?
Are they on the Free plan? No. Premium video models, including Wan 3.0 and Seedance 2.5, are available on Standard and above.